I've spent the last week or so working on revamping the Metascape site to give it a (hopefully) cleaner and less "CMS'ey" look. Along the way, I've become far more familiar than I'd like to be with the vagaries of CSS, browsers, template hacking, etc.. I haven't spent this much time in VM since.. well since I got the site up and running three years ago. I must say that I've been a bit taken aback by the slapped together quality all of the javascript, css and related web infrastructure I've encountered, amd I can't help but look at all the great looking sites out there and realize all of the machinations people have had to go through to make work, and how ugly a lot of the code underneath probably is. On the other hand, CSS itself has a certain kind of elegance and some neat features. One thing that has been interesting to think about in relation to my own work on Acore and Sugar is CSS's approach to having inheritance mediated by containment.
I used Tasktop's excellent site as a bogey, but I haven't been able to get anywhere close to it's quality and user-focussed design and now I've got to move back to writing software, creating builds, etc..There are some cool new features in CSS3 and I've probably overused them. Consequently the site looks (arguably) best on webkit (Safari and Chrome) based browsers, then firefox, and last IE, naturally. I was a bit surprised by how poor firefox's rendering of my and other sites was compared with CSS3. I'm sure if I have any real experience with this stuff I'd have done a better job of getting a consistent result. Anyway, feedback is most welcome. And now that I have this blog appearing as feed into the front page of the site, there will be a bit of self reference there too. I think in the publishing world that's know as "log rolling".
Monday, January 25, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I'm happy to announce that the Virgo Tooling M4 release is available. If you just want to find out more about that, skip ahead to the sectio...
-
Every once in a while I think it makes sense to have a completely on-topic, technical post! One of the (many) things that has been on the ...
-
“So the final lesson of 1918, a simple one yet the one most difficult to execute, is that those who occupy positions of authority must lesse...
-
I've been meaning to start a blog for some time now (years) and the birth of our baby seemed like an especially auspicious time. So welcome ... -
I've been spending quite a bit of time lately playing with the EEF framework. C'est magnifique! (No, I don't actually know any french, but I... -
Just a quicky here.. I like to use views instead of editors for most of my GEF viewers. They are a lot of advantages to views -- the most s...
-
Many of us who've spent time traipsing through the Eclipse wilderness are probably familiar with this story... Tis a beautiful, sunlit 'mo...
-
Every once an a while, a new way of thinking comes along that is so powerful, so unique, so practical -- just so damn cool, really -- that i... -
OK, I am long over-due for an update to the blog, and I have lots to report on, but I've been deep in build hell for the last week, (and the... -
When Butterflyzer was launched a year ago it was introduced with the following words: "Butterflyzer is in Alpha now. Before we release mor...
Nice Layout! Great site!
ReplyDeleteI see lot of new sites with large 'blocks' to navigate instead of smaller 'lists'. Website designers are spending more time to provide a better user experience. Even though, personally, as a programmer, I prefer to see lists to blocks. May be my brain is more used to lists. I can see more content without moving my eyeballs around.
Yeah, it's a tradeoff. I also like to see lots of information at a glance, but the feedback I get consistently form more marketing oriented folks is to make it even more simple and direct. And I think it's true. If you look at the really nice sites like Apple's some links only have a few words..
ReplyDelete